> You clearly state that LLM usage for you is a signal of distrust. Yes, I personally distrust patches with heavy LLM assistance and I do not believe people who say "but I know what I am doing".
This also means that I don't want to spend my free time interacting with such works. So who is protecting me? The disclosure does that: it allows me to just walk away and have someone else look at the patch. And it definitely does protect you, because my negative bias won't be able to drive decisions (unlike in my own projects, where I outright reject such patches). I'm confused why you don't see that this is literally the only compromise that is possible. I won't be contributing to projects, where people do not want to disclose their LLM use, even if it's "well, I use it all the time". That helps me set the expectations. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
