> Well, if you want GHC to become a political vehicle for an ideology Not spelling out values doesn't mean that you don't take sides. Your constant "LLMs are here to stay" and "it's just a tool" is exactly doing that, you are implying that:
- you can't resist, stop resisting - you have to follow everyone else or you will be left behind - your value is only your output It is a mechnical view of open source and collaboration that is focused on the product, not on the culture from which those products arise. My view is different... I think it is the human culture from which those ideas and products originate and Haskell has given a home to many engaged and curious people. We want to keep those people, whether they use LLMs or not. If we don't express a preference for human authorship, we're effectively saying "you have to use LLMs so stay relevant". I think this is very clearly your opinion. It is not mine. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
