I am sure there are many others like you and they are very capable potential contributors. We do have opposing views in the community but I do not think anyone should feel discouraged to contribute because of those who hold opposing views, it will be detrimental to the project, I am sure they will find enough supporters. The real problem starts only if an otherwise good patch is rejected or totally neglected purely on the basis of LLM use.
-harendra On Thu, 16 Jul 2026 at 14:58, Tom Ellis via ghc-devs <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 08:44:10AM -0000, Julian Ospald via ghc-devs wrote: > > I think it is the human culture from which those ideas and products > > originate and Haskell has given a home to many engaged and curious > > people. We want to keep those people, whether they use LLMs or not. > > To add my personal point of view on this, it is only the advent of > LLMs that has made me think I could possibly become a contributor to > GHC. I wouldn't have the stamina to remain engaged otherwise. A > policy that discourages LLM use, in effect if not in word, makes it > less likely I will ever contribute to GHC. (The same goes for most > projects actually.) > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
