I need to prove that GHDL is giving me the same results as Incisive. W'll be taping-out a design some where this year. Although I have confidence GHDL is following the VHDL LRM I do not like unexpected surprises after all.
br, ST On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Rene Doss <d...@gmx.de> wrote: > What would you compare? > > A performance check? > > Or what? > > > Am 07.04.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Simon Thijs de Feber: > > I'll need to do a functional comparison between GHDL and Cadence Incisive. > I just can throw a IP and it's TB at it to do some checks. However this is > not really an intelligent way to do it. > > How could I approach this ? > Take the test suite of GHDL and run this in both simulators ? > > best regards > > Simon > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ghdl-discuss mailing > listGhdl-discuss@gna.orghttps://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ghdl-discuss mailing list > Ghdl-discuss@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
