Hello, in that case you'd better to use your design and your testbench.
They are certainly representative of your coding style and you know them well.
Regards.
Envoyé avec AquaMail pour Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
Le 10 avril 2017 15:24:24 Simon Thijs de Feber <st.de.fe...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
I need to prove that GHDL is giving me the same results as Incisive.
W'll be taping-out a design some where this year.
Although I have confidence GHDL is following the VHDL LRM I do not like
unexpected surprises after all.
br,
ST
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Rene Doss <d...@gmx.de> wrote:
What would you compare?
A performance check?
Or what?
Am 07.04.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Simon Thijs de Feber:
I'll need to do a functional comparison between GHDL and Cadence Incisive.
I just can throw a IP and it's TB at it to do some checks. However this is
not really an intelligent way to do it.
How could I approach this ?
Take the test suite of GHDL and run this in both simulators ?
best regards
Simon
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing
listGhdl-discuss@gna.orghttps://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
----------
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss