On 22 Feb, Manish Singh wrote:
> True, although we have a couple other inconsistencies already. The
> coding style needs to be the same as the rest of gimp though.
I tried to bring it as near as possible. Of course a lot things could
be better....
> It's not that much code, and does fix a gaping hole in the i18n
> framework for plugins not distributed with gimp. Especially if we want
> 1.2 to last a while..
That's absolutely right.
--
Servus,
Daniel
- PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Manish Singh
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Glyph Lefkowitz
- PROPOSAL: New i18n solution (2nd try) Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Marc Lehmann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Jon A. Cruz
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
