On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 10:50:55AM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm not yet convinced that this goal is worth all the hassle. What do
> other people on this list think about this?
Being able to add plug-ins with i18n support is _extremely_
important. Unless the release would be delayed it should be given
priority. Remember that gimp-1.2 will be there to stay for a long time,
presumably.
If the obvious problems with that solution is fixed (rc-format...), it looks
feasible to me.
Especially since the original "solution" to the i18n problems "officially"
has the status of an imperfect hack.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Manish Singh
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Glyph Lefkowitz
- PROPOSAL: New i18n solution (2nd try) Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Marc Lehmann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Jon A. Cruz
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solut... Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solut... Sven Neumann
