On 22 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote:
> With the usage of static array and buffer lengths you demonstrated in
> your patch it will most likely introduce one or two new bugs, but
> that could easily be hacked up a little cleaner
Okay, I took some of the comments and updated the files.
I'm now using a single linked list to store the domains and
I reindented the source to match the other files.
Patch attached...
--
Servus,
Daniel
- PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Manish Singh
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Glyph Lefkowitz
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Marc Lehmann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Jon A. Cruz
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solut... Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
diff30.gz