On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 03:30:06PM +0200, Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > our parser isn't homebrewn and is much better supported by glib than XML
> > is. s-expressions are in my opinion easier to read and write for humans
>
> Knowing that you're an EMACS user I definitely think this statement
> could be true. :) I for one keep the right to think different(TM),
> though.
Sven, he _does_ have a point here ;) XML at least looks familiar (after
all, HTML is a widely known XML applikation) to many people, while lithp
isn't so well-known or used outside the hackers circles.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
