Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I hope that you didn't follow the current GIMP implementation too
> > close. It might have proven to work but it certainly has major
> > drawbacks and I wouldn't suggest it to application developers that
> > think about adding plug-in functionality.
> I've certainly made a lot of changes to make the design cleaner and more
> generic. I don't think that there are many of the drawbacks of the current
> gimp design left in libpdb. Of course, I'm open to suggestions and
the major drawback of the current design is that it doesn't use named
parameters. That is definitely one of the things we should change
right in the beginning of the next development cycle. Does your
library include this change already?
Gimp-developer mailing list