On 10 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I hope that you didn't follow the current GIMP implementation too
> > > close. It might have proven to work but it certainly has major
> > > drawbacks and I wouldn't suggest it to application developers that
> > > think about adding plug-in functionality.
> >
> > I've certainly made a lot of changes to make the design cleaner and more
> > generic. I don't think that there are many of the drawbacks of the current
> > gimp design left in libpdb.  Of course, I'm open to suggestions and
> > patches.
> the major drawback of the current design is that it doesn't use named
> parameters. That is definitely one of the things we should change
> right in the beginning of the next development cycle. Does your
> library include this change already?

Not yet.  But I will put it on the TODO list.


Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to