On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 12:14, David Neary wrote:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Yes, please. But we probably need to get to a point here.
> > GIMP-something.0 sounds pretty weird for a stable release...
> I say it's time for a show of hands. My vote is for 2.0, because
> there are likely to be lots of new bugs and 1.4 makes it sould
> like a really stable release.
I couldn't have said it any better. A new road map (or release plan)
will have to be written no matter if we call the next release 1.4 or 2.0
- and changing a three year old release plan is something that most
people involved with software will understand.
I say we go for 2.0 - and, as mentioned elsewhere on this list, plan for
a quick 2.2 bug-fix release later this year.
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gimp-developer mailing list