On 2003-06-19 at 1504.01 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen typed this:
> On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 12:14, David Neary wrote:
> > Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > Yes, please. But we probably need to get to a point here.
> > > GIMP-something.0 sounds pretty weird for a stable release...
> > I say it's time for a show of hands. My vote is for 2.0, because
> > there are likely to be lots of new bugs and 1.4 makes it sould
> > like a really stable release.
> I couldn't have said it any better. A new road map (or release plan)
> will have to be written no matter if we call the next release 1.4 or 2.0
> - and changing a three year old release plan is something that most
> people involved with software will understand.
> I say we go for 2.0 - and, as mentioned elsewhere on this list, plan for
> a quick 2.2 bug-fix release later this year.
is this you volunteering to fix the wiki?
Gimp-developer mailing list