On 2003-06-19 at 1504.01 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen typed this: > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 12:14, David Neary wrote: > > Sven Neumann wrote: > > > Yes, please. But we probably need to get to a point here. > > > GIMP-something.0 sounds pretty weird for a stable release... > > > > I say it's time for a show of hands. My vote is for 2.0, because > > there are likely to be lots of new bugs and 1.4 makes it sould > > like a really stable release. > > I couldn't have said it any better. A new road map (or release plan) > will have to be written no matter if we call the next release 1.4 or 2.0 > - and changing a three year old release plan is something that most > people involved with software will understand. > > I say we go for 2.0 - and, as mentioned elsewhere on this list, plan for > a quick 2.2 bug-fix release later this year. > is this you volunteering to fix the wiki?
http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/ carol _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
