On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:58:27AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:17:43PM -0800, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libgtk2.0-0
> > >
> > i guess that apt is not so well named lately? maybe "apt not to" is
> > better?
> $ apt-get install libgtk2.0-0/unstable
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Selected version 2.6.1-2 (Debian-amd64:3.2/unstable) for libgtk2.0-0
> libgtk2.0-0 is already the newest version.
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 77 not upgraded.
> 2.6 is definitely in unstable, and apt works fine to retrieve it.
this confirms my suspicions that apt has a personal vendetta against
Gimp-developer mailing list