Thanks for the link to the new website.

> 1 : http://pippin.gimp.org/gggl/
> 2 : http://pippin.gimp.org/babl/

So is it your opinion that we should ditch GEGL and
use BABL instead since you think it is in a usable
state? I don't understand what is meant by "image"
handling. Currently GIMP does all the image handling,
right? We're trying to abstract this in GEGL so that
we are doing more than just data format conversions
and access points? What is meant by image handling --
this huge piece of GEGL that is still missing?

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to