Actually I got the impression that it had changed, and now
box-filtering was used, which does account for all input pixels.
OTOH, Lanczos currently produces poor results. Geert Jordaans (sp?)
was working on improving this.

On 10/30/07, Guillermo Espertino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd add the quality of downscaling as a high priority need. Currently
> it's possible to downscale images using 50% steps at a time (it was
> discussed before) but it would be better if one single scaling step
> produces the best quality possible (maybe automating the 50% steps, as
> it was discussed before).
> IIRC Sven informed that this issue would be easier to address with GEGL,
> so I don't know if proposing this fix before GEGL is appropriate. Anyway
> I'd like to point that it's a need for people who work with graphics for
> the web.
>
> Gez.
> _______________________________________________
> Gimp-developer mailing list
> Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
>
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to