On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 19:16 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
> I'd add the quality of downscaling as a high priority need. Currently
> it's possible to downscale images using 50% steps at a time (it was
> discussed before) but it would be better if one single scaling step
> produces the best quality possible (maybe automating the 50% steps, as
> it was discussed before).
This is an important issue. But it has to be addressed in GEGL as we
will soon start to use the GEGL scaling routines. Definitely an
important task to put on the tasks list for GEGL.
Gimp-developer mailing list