On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 20:03 +0000, William Skaggs wrote:

> > I think it would be a lot more useful if we would just collect a list of
> > tasks that we consider important, without sticking them into a
> > particular release time-frame. That will make it easier for new
> > developers to participate. And that's what's most important.
> That leaves the UI team with no way of influencing development,
> and no way to know what they should be working on.  If the
> idea is to have a specification before something is implemented,
> then the process needs to have more structure.

You are throwing things together here. My proposal was for the task list
that should be published prominently on www.gimp.org. Of course we need
to discuss what will be done in the next development cycle. We have
always done that and we will always do that. No one ever questioned


Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to