On Friday 13 March 2009 14:02:04 Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 13:34 +0200, Alexia Death wrote: > > Use of image hose for brush transformation is abuse that hopefully is > > no longer needed. They are useful ho ever for complex animated brushes > > and as such should remain to be supported. I myself have made for > > example a hose brush that creates weaving lines. Another use is grass > > and fur brushes that need random and varying shaped stamps. All very > > valid and common usecases. > > Do we need the full complexity of the current image hoses for this? > Looks like a simple linear series of brushes could be sufficient.
I agree with David here. Id say allowing max 3 dimensions is enough. Bushes should indicate default driving dynamics for these dimensions but the user should be able to remap them to any dynamic they desire. I will make it part of dynamics spec Im going to write for Peter so he can think of UI. The image hoses code is long due overhaul because the dynamics system now in core and this concept change should be part of it. -- Alexia _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
