On 2015-11-02 13:39, Elle Stone wrote:
On 11/02/2015 02:23 AM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
The curve-bend plugin is quiet versatile for image manipulation, e.g.
when placing labels on a curved surface, and the Free curve type option
to make some drooping effects on images etc.

My request is that we have this plugin as an on-canvas tool, with
options for bending the top, lower, left, right and inner parts of an image.

I am aware of a similar tool in photoshop called "warp tool".

I'm confused about where the line is - what the difference is -
between discussions of the GUI and discussions regarding
new/existing/modified editing algorithms. This is not the first
instance on the Gimp-gui list where I've been puzzling over the
difference, but it's a good example.

That's still a GUI discussion when it involves user interaction. For instance, if we want a new tool (case here), the interaction should be clearly specified (what the tool allows, what happens when you click on some widgets, whatever…). This would prevent us to experience too much of cases where we end up with tools utterly broken in the dev version.

Now this is not only about dropping ideas and leaving either (not saying this is the case here), which has no interest in the context of this mailing list and which will leave nowhere.


Also, what does "on-canvas" mean?

gimp-gui-list mailing list

Reply via email to