>>PIMP - The Photoshop-like Image Manipulation Program
>That one gets my vote, but only if the acronym can stand for
>"Primary Image Manipulation Program." After all, the title should
>be as accurately descriptive as possible.
>IMO the idea that GIMP is somehow "chasing after" or "trying to be"
>an Adobe product is very dangerous, and it comes straight from
>Adobe's marketing department. I happen to LIKE the difference, and
>by like I mean, the differences have a positive impact on my
>Does Gnome try to "be" the latest Microsoft or MAC desktop
>interface? Does VLC try to "be" Windows Media Player, or Amarok
>aspire to "be" iTunes? Do the users of these tools feel compelled
>to name a commercial package that does roughly the same things every
>time they mention the tool they DO use?
Fully agree with that. Includes word «Photoshop» in name is big self disrespect
> My vote: leave it alone.
Also agree with you. However rebranding would not prevent.
gimp-user-list mailing list