On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Stephen Allen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:53:29PM +0100, maderios wrote:
>> On 11/04/2013 02:30 AM, dksill wrote:
>> >I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
>> >unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a file.
>> >
>> Hi
>> It's a "very old" story... *Four years ago* Gimp developer Martin
>> Nordholts explained on his blog:
>> "A lot of people over at GIMPUSERS.com want the old save and
>> "export" mechanism back. The conclusion to draw from that is that
>> they are not part of the user group we are targeting. We are not
>> trying to make GIMP into an excellent JPEG touchup application, we
>> are making GIMP into a high-end photo manipulation application where
>> most of the work is done in XCF."
>> http://www.chromecode.com/2009/09/reactions-on-gimp-270.html
>> Therefore we, professional (or advanced users),  are not "the user
>> group (they) are targeting... Martin Nordholts forgot other image
>> formats, better than jpeg because they are not destructive: png,
>> tiff. These three formats are very used in professional world but
>> Martin Nordholts an gimp team sadly ignore it...
>> Greetings
>> --
> This subject has been worn out - Please stop it maderios! Professional image
> editors don't work in jpeg format. It's an end use format. Think non 
> destructive
> editing.

Maderios has already been unsubscribed for repetitive violation of the
code of conduct.

gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

Reply via email to