On 28 December 2013 16:15, Richard <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:37:37 +0100
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Why so COMPLICATED?
>>
>> This question has been asked elsewhere. A solution is to paste the full
>> object to a new layer, add a layer mask, fill the shape with a shaped
>> gradient (which is a function of the distance to the outline) and then
>> use the Brightess/Contrast (2 sliders), Levels (5 sliders), or Curves
>> (256 sliders) to adjust the blend.
>
> On a tangent, you just pointed out the biggest flaw with shaped gradients:
> You can't specify a gradient length. What's the point of even having it
> without that functionality? I'd get faster (more precise, controllable,
> etc.) results by brushing the edges by hand.
>
> -- Stratadrake
> [email protected]
> --------------------
> Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address: [email protected]
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: [email protected]
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
