Sorry - clciekd on "send" by mistake on the previous message. On 29 December 2013 17:09, Joao S. O. Bueno <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28 December 2013 16:15, Richard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> This question has been asked elsewhere. A solution is to paste the full >>> object to a new layer, add a layer mask, fill the shape with a shaped >>> gradient (which is a function of the distance to the outline) and then >>> use the Brightess/Contrast (2 sliders), Levels (5 sliders), or Curves >>> (256 sliders) to adjust the blend. >> >> On a tangent, you just pointed out the biggest flaw with shaped gradients: >> You can't specify a gradient length. What's the point of even having it >> without that functionality? I'd get faster (more precise, controllable, >> etc.) results by brushing the edges by hand. Note that on the script, I could walk around this by performing gaussian-blur + levels on the pasted layer's mask, instead of using gradients. But indeed,you have a point there. I even went to check if the "offset" parameter of the gradient-tool could give one the control missing for shaped gradients, but it has no effect at all. >> >> -- Stratadrake >> [email protected] >> -------------------- >> Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gimp-user-list mailing list >> List address: [email protected] >> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: [email protected] List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
