On the other hand, this is clearly a buggy behavior - we should just
open a bug report for that, (and hope it is an easy fix)
On 30 December 2013 15:25, Richard <strata_ran...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 29 December 2013 17:09, Joao S. O. Bueno <gwid...@mpc.com.br> wrote:
>> > On 28 December 2013 16:15, Richard <strata_ran...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > On a tangent, you just pointed out the biggest flaw with shaped
>> > gradients: You can't specify a gradient length. What's the point of even
>> > having it without that functionality? I'd get faster (more precise,
>> > controllable, etc.) results by brushing the edges by hand.
>> Note that on the script, I could walk around this by performing
>> gaussian-blur + levels
>> on the pasted layer's mask, instead of using gradients.
>> But indeed,you have a point there. I even went to check if the
>> "offset" parameter of the gradient-tool could give one the control missing
>> for shaped gradients, but it has no effect at all.
> The worst part is that you HAVE to click AND drag to execute the gradient -
> simply clicking and releasing won't engage it. So GIMP already has a
> specified gradient length available but is simply ignoring it.
> -- Stratadrake
> Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: email@example.com
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list