Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-13-03 07:41]:
> > On 13 Oct 2003 11:55:27 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Selling GIMP tee-shirts, manuals, CDs and other stuff may be
> > interesting, but I would prefer to have this done by a company that
> > would be a separate legal entity. Otherwise, there could be some
> > conflicts between a commercial GIMP Foundation and the companies that
> > are already selling GIMP stuff (ftgimp, macgimp/wingimp, xdarwin and
> > probably several others). I would like the GIMP Foundation to be
> > seen as "neutral" and clearly non-commercial, so that the companies
> > who are selling GIMP CDs could make a donation to the foundation
> > without feeling that they are giving money to a potential competitor.
> Perhaps the selling of a license (rights) to produce and/or sell items
> would be an acceptable alternative.
Doesn't sound acceptable to me. What would give the GIMP foundation
the right to sell licenses? I don't think we want to be in possession
of any trademarks whatsoever.
Gimp-user mailing list