On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 22:04, Sven Neumann wrote:
> You should consider to rename the package to gimp2.0 or gimp2 so that
> the full package name becomes gimp2.0-2.0pre1 or gimp2-2.0pre1. Then
> it could coexist with the gimp package (that should have been called
> gimp1.2 to begin with).
I renamed it to gimp2.0 and installed it.
rpm -i -v gimp2.0-2.0pre1-1mdk.i586.rpm
It is installed as gimp-1.3. Is this correct ?
It does not seem to have the help files...I'd like to have some tips
about the new user interface.
registered linux user #341648
"I knew it. He's the One." -- Tank, "The Matrix"
Gimp-user mailing list