On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 22:04, Sven Neumann wrote: > You should consider to rename the package to gimp2.0 or gimp2 so that > the full package name becomes gimp2.0-2.0pre1 or gimp2-2.0pre1. Then > it could coexist with the gimp package (that should have been called > gimp1.2 to begin with).
I renamed it to gimp2.0 and installed it. rpm -i -v gimp2.0-2.0pre1-1mdk.i586.rpm It is installed as gimp-1.3. Is this correct ? It does not seem to have the help files...I'd like to have some tips about the new user interface. TIA -- josenildo marques icq #289971493 homepage http://cyb.ezdir.net registered linux user #341648 ********* "I knew it. He's the One." -- Tank, "The Matrix" _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
