Le lun 08/03/2004 à 17:38, Dave Neary a écrit : > > However as a user I'm fascinated by part of the closing statement > > "Gimp can already do many things that are difficult or impossible with > > Photoshop" and I would love if the author or anyone else could elaborate > > on this. It would make a very good pulicity piece to accompany the > > release notes. > > I'm not sure what Raymond had in mind. Raymond? Que dis-tu? > I did'nt write this. I often avoid to speak or compare Gimp to Photoshop. The Chapter "11.Coming soon" is a new Chapter added by someone on the Wiki.
What I wrote is : Historiquement Gimp 2.0 devait apporter la touche « professionnelle » qui lui manque, à savoir le support natif du format CMJN et le 16 bits/canal pour la vidéo. Il n'en sera rien, il y a déjà quelques années le choix des développeurs de Gimp s'est porté sur un projet à moyen terme de librairies graphiques de nouvelle génération, projet nommé GEGL. Mais comme dans le monde du libre les projets n'avancent pas forcément à l'allure souhaitée, les librairies GEGL ne seront finalement intégrées qu'au cours de la vie de Gimp 2, pour la version 2.4. --- translated by Eric in : Initially, Gimp 2.0 would include the "professionnal" touch that the previous releases are missing: native support for CMYK and 16 bits/channel for video editing. This features will not appear now, as Gimp developpers choose to work on a medium-term project; this project is new generation graphical libraries called GEGL. But in free software, projects have planning of their own, and GEGL will be included during Gimp 2 stable cycle, maybe release 2.4. an it was in the introduction not at the end of the document. @+ Raymond _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
