"Kalle Ounapuu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So now I have 4 images which all look about the same, ranging
> in size from 19419 to 30705. Quite a hit or miss process. One
> would think indexing and crushing would yield the smallest
> image, but it did not.
There are lots of options when indexing. If your goal is smaller
file-size, you should avoid dithering, or at least do positioned
Gimp-user mailing list