Hi, "Kalle Ounapuu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So now I have 4 images which all look about the same, ranging > in size from 19419 to 30705. Quite a hit or miss process. One > would think indexing and crushing would yield the smallest > image, but it did not. There are lots of options when indexing. If your goal is smaller file-size, you should avoid dithering, or at least do positioned dithering. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
