Steve Thompson wrote: > About the whole naming issue. > >
> I remember recently attending a local club for photography > enthusiasts. The question came up of what image editing software > various people used. Photoshop was a frequent answer, as one would > anticipate, as were a number of other Windows based tools. I made > mention of the Gimp, and people looked at me rather peculiarly. I > went on to mention that it was a very powerful application and > completely free, but beyond their bewilderment, not even a bit of > interest was expressed. > Maybe a 15 minute GIMP demo of something that is not easy to do in Photoshop is in order. Most clubs are happy to have offers to show new techniques. > > A cute name just doesn't spell for me the kind of future user > penetration I would like for the Gimp to have. Names do have value - > do you think an image editor called 'Snuggles' would gain much > traction with serious photo professionals? I don't, because just like > 'the Gimp', it conveys a tool that doesn't take itself seriously. > I have no trouble taking 'GIMP' seriously--the website is good at showing it is a major program, with documentation and tutorials. If you can introduce it well enough that someone other than you mentions at a photo club meeting that they had fun trying out the GIMP, the name is no longer a barrier. But are you sure the name is a barrier? it may be that people like what they are used to and don't like learning curves, no matter what they are called (it probably took quite a bit of time for them to become comfortable with their first image editing program). The odd name could help people remember it. "'Smuckers,' with a name like that it's gotta be good" -Ken _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user