* gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-02-07 13:47]: Much unnecessary quote removed..... > One thing I forgot to mention is that if you are simply trying to edit an > image for your own use and can revisit the original then the absense of > non-destrucitve editing features may not be a handicap. The point is to know > what you can and cannot do with each and every toolset and when a tool is > appropriate to your needs and when it is not.
You keep getting back to this "non-destructive editing". WHO can edit an image for what-ever purpose and not retain the original? HOW can you edit <anything> and not have a copy of <anything> to begin with? You have confirmed your statis as NOISE and nothing else. IF you choose to to respond, do so to the LIST. A personal response is unwanted/unrequired/unnecessary/spam. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
