Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:18:55AM CEST, I got a letter where David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > What's the most common thing to do? pull or update?
update for normal users. > which is easier to type? > what are people used to? I think 'git up' is easier to type than 'git pull'. It's the CVS/SVN tradition, though, probably not the BK tradition. > I'm not sure but I suggest that pull and get would be better choices. > > git pull > git get I don't like git get; it is something completely new - not in CVS/SVN and means something completely different in BK, apparently. > is it rare enough to justify: > git --download-only pull Dunno. I do it personally all the time, with git at least. What do others think? :-) I start to like the pull/update distinction, and I think I'll go for it. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html