Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:18:55AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> What's the most common thing to do? pull or update?
update for normal users.
> which is easier to type?
> what are people used to?
I think 'git up' is easier to type than 'git pull'. It's the CVS/SVN
tradition, though, probably not the BK tradition.
> I'm not sure but I suggest that pull and get would be better choices.
>
> git pull
> git get
I don't like git get; it is something completely new - not in CVS/SVN
and means something completely different in BK, apparently.
> is it rare enough to justify:
> git --download-only pull
Dunno. I do it personally all the time, with git at least.
What do others think? :-)
I start to like the pull/update distinction, and I think I'll go for it.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
