Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:09:06AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Yeah, yeah, it looks different from "cvs update", but dammit, wouldn't it 
> be cool to just write "cg-<tab><tab>" and see the command choices? Or 
> "cg-up<tab>" and get cg-update done for you..

I like this idea! :-) I guess that is in fact exactly what I have been
looking for, and (as probably apparent from the current git-pasky
structure) I prefer to have the scripts separated anyway.

I think I will go for it. I also thought about having this _and_ a 'cg'
command which would act as a completely dumb multiplexer, but I decided
to toss that idea since it would only create usage ambiguity and other
problems on the long run.

                                Petr "Pasky" Baudis
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to