On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:23:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Tony Luck wrote:
> > This is what happens ("linus" is a local branch just pulled from kernel.org,
> > so it just contains one pack file and its index).
> > 
> > $ cg-update linus
> > `/home/aegl/GIT/linus/.git/refs/heads/master' -> `.git/refs/heads/linus'
> > does not exist 
> > /home/aegl/GIT/linus/.git/objects/04/3d051615aa5da09a7e44f1edbb69
> > 798458e067
> > Cannot obtain needed object 043d051615aa5da09a7e44f1edbb69798458e067
> > while processing commit 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000.
> > cg-pull: objects pull failed
> 
> Ok. The immediate fix is to just unpack the pack:
> 
>       mv .git/objects/pack/* .git/
>       for i in .git/*.pack; do git-unpack-objects < $i; done
> 
> (or similar - the above is untested, but I think it should be obvious 
> enough what I'm trying to do).

This is evil on the bandwidth, since you'll keep refetching the packed
object (64MB of it) over and over.

However, I've tried the above, and I get:

$ mv .git/objects/pack/* .git/
$ for i in .git/*.pack; do git-unpack-objects < $i; done
Unpacking 55435 objects
fatal: inflate returned -3

so it seems that the pack is corrupt... or something.

$ md5sum .git/*.pack
2be38f2947b99bcd088c1930122aadec  
.git/pack-e3117bbaf6a59cb53c3f6f0d9b17b9433f0e4135.pack

and git-fsck-cache produces lots and lots of:

dangling tree fae688b62db0b553aae0bf17f0f70e93819dec2b
broken link from    tree faed7d798b84f107dbb9ff8fa97fb909c9ea5347
              to    blob 008e19210e66f01fbaef1aba30243850766b8b12
broken link from    tree faed7d798b84f107dbb9ff8fa97fb909c9ea5347
              to    blob edae09a4b021e353ab4fbba756e31492fbb8fd2e
broken link from    tree faed7d798b84f107dbb9ff8fa97fb909c9ea5347
              to    blob d098b3ba35384fb912989348fd6da59820711ca4
... etc ...

-- 
Russell King

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to