Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com> writes:

> On 2012.7.25 3:19 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com> writes:
>>> How about the git-svn SVN 1.7 fix in general?  All of these patch sets I'm
>>> sending build on one another, is that going to be a problem?  It's going to
>>> come in about six parts.
>> Judging from the rate of the discussion this is progressing, I was
>> imagining that this series would be ready by 1.7.13 at the earliest,
>> possibly back-merged to 1.7.12.X maintenance series, and 1.7.11.X
>> maintenance series is no longer relevant by then.
>> But I certainly do not mind seeing the series based on earlier
>> maintenance releases, e.g. maint-1.7.9.  There however are tons of
>> other git-svn.perl and perl/ updates since then, so basing the
>> series on the current maint branch to abandon 1.7.10.X and earlier
>> but still leaving the door open to downmerge to 1.7.11.X may be a
>> good trade-off.
> So... is that master or maint?  Just let me know which one.

I do not care too deeply either way, and in the end I think Eric
should have the final say.

Given that git://git.bogomips.org/git-svn.git/ has 'master' but
nothing to build on 'maint', I would imagine that basing on master
is just fine.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to