Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Wong <normalper...@yhbt.net> writes:
> > The redundant dependencies are biting us :<  I agree there presence in
> > the top-level Makefile needs to be reviewed.
> Do you feel confident enough that we can leave that question hanging
> around and still merge this before 1.7.12 safely?


> I do not think it is a regression at the Makefile level per-se---we
> didn't have right dependencies to keep perl.mak up to date, which
> was the root cause of what we observed.
> But the lack of dependencies did not matter before this series
> because the list of *.pm files never changed, so in that sense the
> series is what introduced the build regression, and I do not have a
> solid feeling that we squashed it.

Right, I agree the original dependencies are not good and it's not
a recent regression in the Makefile level.

I do feel our patch deals with the problem for now.  I've been going
between commits in Michael's 3rd series and haven't noticed new issues
when running the tests.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to