Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Eric Wong <normalper...@yhbt.net> writes: > > The redundant dependencies are biting us :< I agree there presence in > > the top-level Makefile needs to be reviewed. > > Do you feel confident enough that we can leave that question hanging > around and still merge this before 1.7.12 safely?
Yes. > I do not think it is a regression at the Makefile level per-se---we > didn't have right dependencies to keep perl.mak up to date, which > was the root cause of what we observed. > > But the lack of dependencies did not matter before this series > because the list of *.pm files never changed, so in that sense the > series is what introduced the build regression, and I do not have a > solid feeling that we squashed it. Right, I agree the original dependencies are not good and it's not a recent regression in the Makefile level. I do feel our patch deals with the problem for now. I've been going between commits in Michael's 3rd series and haven't noticed new issues when running the tests. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html