On 5 October 2012 03:00, Andrew Ardill <andrew.ard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5 October 2012 07:20, Marco Craveiro <marco.crave...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> Similar but not quite; the idea is that you know that there is some
>> code (I'm just talking about files here, so lets ignore hunks for the
>> moment) which is normally checked in but for a period of time you want
>> it ignored. So you don't want it git ignored but at the same time you
>> don't want to see these files in the list of modified files.
> What is the reason git ignore is no good in this case? Is it simply
> that you can't see the ignored files in git status, or is it that
> adding and removing entries to .gitignore is too cumbersome? If it's
> the latter you could probably put together a simple shell wrapper to
> automate the task, as otherwise it seems like git ignore does what you
> need.

Git ignore doesn't ignore tracked files.


perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to