W dniu 25.09.2016 o 22:17, Kevin Daudt pisze:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:15:41AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

>> Oops, yes. It is beginning to make the "strbuf_swap()" look less
>> convoluted. :)
> I've switched to strbuf_swap now, much better. I've implemented
> recursive parsing without looking at what you provided, just to see what
> I'd came up with. Though I've not implemented a recursive descent
> parser, but it might suffice.

I think you can implement a parser handling proper nesting of parens
without recursion.

Though... what is the definition in the RFC?
Jakub Narębski

Reply via email to