Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
> Implemented now. I'm not handling the 'tip' revision, but most likely
> it's also the '.' revision. In this case a fake 'master' bookmark will
> be created to track that revision.
Hi Felipe. Sorry for the slow response, I've been snowed under with work and
have only just got around to testing your latest version.
The new remote-hg.track-branches=false option is great and does exactly what
I was hoping for. For the benefit of the list archives, one natural way to
use it is
git clone -c remote-hg.track-branches=false hg::foo
when cloning the relevant repositories, if you don't want the setting
globally for every hg-remote clone.
During testing, I've seen some strange behaviour which I think is caused by
using the . revision instead of tip:
$ hg init h
$ hg init h2
$ ( cd h && touch foo && hg add foo && hg commit -m foo && hg push ../h2 )
pushing to ../h2
searching for changes
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
$ git clone hg::h g
Cloning into 'g'...
$ git clone hg::h2 g2
Cloning into 'g2'...
warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout.
The reason for this is that by default . == null (not tip) in the repo h2
which we pushed into from h. The hg equivalent of a bare repo typically has a
null checkout like this. (Actually, the checkout of HEAD seems to break
whenever . is different from tip, not just when it's null as in this example.)
Apart from this, everything seems solid and works well. Really useful; thanks!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html