Patrick Lehner <> writes:

> But just because mv's error essage isnt very good, does that mean git
> mv's error message mustn't be better?

Did I say the error message from 'mv' was not very good in the
message you are responding to (by the way, this is why you should
never top-post when you are responding to a message on this list)?

I meant to say that the message from 'mv' is good enough, so is the
one given by 'git mv'.

I wouldn't reject a patch that updates our message to something more
informative without looking at it, though.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to