On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:56:40PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> > getdelim(3) returns -1 at the end of the file and if it encounters an
> > error, but sets errno only in the latter case. Set errno to zero before
> > calling it to avoid misdiagnosing an out-of-memory condition due to a
> > left-over value from some other function call.
> Looks good to me.
> > Do we need to save and restore the original value of errno? I doubt it,
> > but didn't think deeply about it, yet.
> I'd say no. Anybody depending on strbuf_getwholeline() is clearly
> already wrong in the error case. And in general I think we assume that
> syscalls can clear errno on success if they choose to (this isn't a
> syscall, but obviously it is calling some).
Shouldn't ideally errno being reset to 0 upon check of the syscall
successful run right after that syscall? (I also see some spots within
git code where it sets errno to ENOMEM)
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419