Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > ... > fixed. > ... > fixed the text... > ... > I am not fully convinced all descriptions are in recent history, but I > tend to agree that most are, so probably the trade off is a wash.
So what do we want with this topic? I think the "teach 'git log' to highlight commits whose changes involve the given blob" is a more or less an orthogonal thing, and I suspect that it is something users may (although I personally do not) find valuable to have a related but different feature in "git describe".
