Stefan Beller <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: >> I had to squash in the following to make 'pu' pass under >> gettext-poison build. Is this ready for 'next' otherwise? > > I saw that in pu, thanks for squashing. I should have spoken > up earlier confirming it.
So is this ready for 'next' if it is squashed? >> With the "log --find-object" thing, it may be that this no longer is >> needed, but then again we haven't done anything with the other >> Jonathan's idea to unify the --find-object thing into the --pickaxe >> framework. > > I'll look into that after I finish looking at a submodule related bug. Thanks. >> It seems that we tend to open and then abandon new interests without >> seeing them through completion, leaving too many loose ends untied. >> This has to stop. > > I'll try to find my balance again. Sorry, but this was not really about you, but was more about me. I probably should more aggressively drop a topic that stalled and also merge a topic that reached the point of diminishing returns to 'next'.
