On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: > Stefan Beller <[email protected]> writes: > >> ... >> fixed. >> ... >> fixed the text... >> ... >> I am not fully convinced all descriptions are in recent history, but I >> tend to agree that most are, so probably the trade off is a wash. > > So what do we want with this topic? I think the "teach 'git log' to > highlight commits whose changes involve the given blob" is a more or > less an orthogonal thing,
Well, both of them solve our immediate needs, so I'd be fine with pursuing just one of them, but I do not oppose taking both. > and I suspect that it is something users > may (although I personally do not) find valuable to have a related > but different feature in "git describe". agreed.
