On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Sergey Organov wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> > The wording is poor either way, but you are also not a native speaker so
> > we have to rely on, say, Eric to help us out here.
> Likely, but why didn't you keep original wording from --preserve-merges?
> Do you feel it's somehow poor either?

Yes, I felt it is poor, especially when --recreate-merges is present, that
is indeed why I changed it.


Reply via email to