Ethan Reesor <firelizz...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Ethan Reesor <firelizz...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Again, would it not be more elegant and powerful to A) have the
>>> shell-disabled message/hook/etc specified by git-config on some level,
>>> be it /etc/gitconfig or ~/.gitconfig, and B) have Jonathan's patch
>>> whereby ~/git-shell-commands/help returning non-zero closes the
>> Isn't that what I have essentially been saying?
> That is what you've been saying. I reiterated because I like the idea
> of having it managed via git config.
Yes, and I've been ignoring the "git config". I do not think it
gives enough customizability Jonathan's example of listing user
owned repositories, for example. Having a config variable in
/etc/gitconfig that points at a random script on the filesystem does
not buy us much over an approach to have a global hook at a known
place on the filesystem, no?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html