John Keeping <> writes:

> git-hash-object(1) implies that it will apply the clean filter and EOL
> conversion when it's given a path to a file in the working tree (as it
> is here).  Is that not the case?

Applying clean to smudged contents _ought to_ recover clean version,
but is that "ought to" something you would want to rely on?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to