John Keeping <> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> John Keeping <> writes:
>> > git-hash-object(1) implies that it will apply the clean filter and EOL
>> > conversion when it's given a path to a file in the working tree (as it
>> > is here).  Is that not the case?
>> Applying clean to smudged contents _ought to_ recover clean version,
>> but is that "ought to" something you would want to rely on?
> How does git-status figure out that file that has been touch'd does not
> have unstaged changes without relying on this?  Surely this case is no
> different from that?

I just checked.  ce_modified_check_fs() does ce_compare_data() which
does the same "hash the path and compare the resulting hash".  So I
think we are OK.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to