On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping <j...@keeping.me.uk> writes:
> > git-hash-object(1) implies that it will apply the clean filter and EOL
> > conversion when it's given a path to a file in the working tree (as it
> > is here). Is that not the case?
> Applying clean to smudged contents _ought to_ recover clean version,
> but is that "ought to" something you would want to rely on?
How does git-status figure out that file that has been touch'd does not
have unstaged changes without relying on this? Surely this case is no
different from that?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html