Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" <artag...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:44 PM
>> This follows-up , with three important differences:
>> 1. pushremote_get() and remote_get() share code better. Thanks Jeff.
>> 2. All spelling mistakes have been corrected. Thanks Eric.
>> 3. One new test for each of the new configuration variables. The
>> extra two parts [2/6] and [3/6] preprare the file for introducing
>> tests. However, I've not gone overboard in this preparation; I don't
>> replicate the work done by Jonathan in .
>> Thanks for reading.
>> : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/218410
>> Ramkumar Ramachandra (6):
>> remote.c: simplify a bit of code using git_config_string()
>> t5516 (fetch-push): update test description
>> t5516 (fetch-push): introduce mk_test_with_name()
>> remote.c: introduce a way to have different remotes for fetch/push
>> remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault
>> remote.c: introduce branch.<name>.pushremote
>> Documentation/config.txt | 23 +++++++++++++++---
> Shouldn't Documentation/gitworkflows.txt also be updated with the triangular
> workflow and its configuration?
Currently, Documentation/gitworkflows.txt makes no effort to explain
how to set up configuration variables for centralized or distributed
workflows. I don't see how I could patch the existing document to
include this workflow, without changing the entire structure of the
document (left as an exercise for future patches).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html