Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" <artag...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:44 PM > >> This follows-up , with three important differences: >> >> 1. pushremote_get() and remote_get() share code better. Thanks Jeff. >> >> 2. All spelling mistakes have been corrected. Thanks Eric. >> >> 3. One new test for each of the new configuration variables. The >> extra two parts [2/6] and [3/6] preprare the file for introducing >> tests. However, I've not gone overboard in this preparation; I don't >> replicate the work done by Jonathan in . >> >> Thanks for reading. >> >> : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/218410 >> : >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/218451/focus=218465 >> >> Ramkumar Ramachandra (6): >> remote.c: simplify a bit of code using git_config_string() >> t5516 (fetch-push): update test description >> t5516 (fetch-push): introduce mk_test_with_name() >> remote.c: introduce a way to have different remotes for fetch/push >> remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault >> remote.c: introduce branch.<name>.pushremote >> >> Documentation/config.txt | 23 +++++++++++++++--- > > > Shouldn't Documentation/gitworkflows.txt also be updated with the triangular > workflow and its configuration?
Currently, Documentation/gitworkflows.txt makes no effort to explain how to set up configuration variables for centralized or distributed workflows. I don't see how I could patch the existing document to include this workflow, without changing the entire structure of the document (left as an exercise for future patches). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html